So. yeah. Thought I'd hang back a bit of the
Green Lantern trailer, what with everyone else banging on about it, but I guess I'd better add me bitsworth. Seems the trailer has come in for a lot of flak. Criticisms tend to be around the
Ryan Reynolds is NOT Hal Jordan and
It looks Cheesy and Childish area.
Well, from what I can tell from the few minutes the trailer affords us, Ryan Reynolds is very much Hal Jordan. No, don't bother arguing with me, fanboy. I was reading Green Lantern comics when you were still a wayward paddler in your daddy's nutsack. I'm right. You're wrong. Hal Jordan, at least the Hal Jordan in the Green Lantern comics that I read - you know, the
good Green Lantern comics - is the archetype vain, womanising, danger-loving, devil-may-care test pilot. & I reckon Ryan reynolds fits
that Hal Jordan fairly perfectly.
Straight up: who wants to watch a Green lantern film about the Denny O'Neil/Neal Adams' touchy-feely caring sharing poe-faced twat Lantern? or, worse yet, the super nazi wet dream Lantern that we got now? Well, you might. But not Joe. No siree.
And as for the cheesy and childish thing: well, why not? really? Does every superhero film have to be
The Dark Knight? Grim and gritty works great with Batman ( although, in all fairness, I'm getting a bit bored with that these days, an' all ), but just because it works with Batman, that doesn't mean it's going to work for every other superhero. Look at
Superman Returns if you want undeniable proof that dark does not always neccessarily equate with good. Why can't we have a superhero film that's full of colour and fireworks?
&, for the record. . .
Mark Strong looks fucking awesome.
Let's face it: Green Lantern ain't gonna be no earth-shattering greatest-film-ever-made thing, that's for sure, in fact it may even turn out to be one great big old turd-duffer, but right now, as far as your not-so-humble blog chum is concerned, it looks like it's gonna be a whole lotta popcorn-munching kiora-quaffing fun. Which is all I ask of any superhero film.
And, hey. It could be worse. You seen the
Thor trailer? Fuck me!!! Now,
that blows chunks!
3 comments:
I suspect we're of a similar age. I was reading Green Lantern comic books back in the early 1960s. I still am not sold that Reynolds has "the right stuff". We'll see.
I'm with ya all the way on this one, Joe! You tell em!
Gotta say i disagree with you 100% on what you say was HAL JORDAN.
I dont recall him being a " jack tripper" type of womanizer in the 1960s AT ALL.
Even in EMERALD DAWN (1989) he wasnt a jokey care free guy.... he was however irresponsible. Thats different.
The Neal Adams and Geoff Johns - straightforward no BS HAL JORDAN is what defines that character.
the CGI is bad. The suttle liberties in the origin are bad.
The tone of the film comes off more like a Spidey film.
This will be = to Superman Returns in everway.
Post a Comment